All posts by CadyLy

TFI #14

14. Be able to list and explain the six major developments in the history of the Early Church

1.  The Formation of the Early Church:  The formation of the early Church is seen in the book of the Acts of the Apostles.  Pentecost is particularly seen as the birthday of the Church.  The Holy Spirit effected a radical change upon the men in the Upper Room.  Peter was suddenly speaking eloquently instead of in his usual foot-in-mouth way.  They were transformed from a group of men who were scared and hiding to men who were no longer afraid and even went about preaching in front of the large crowds gathered for this Jewish celebration.  The Church relies utterly upon the Spirit and the Spirit provides the Church what it needs.  At Pentecost, a) the people of God gathered, b) they were inspired by the Holy Spirit and c) they were sent forth in mission.  Pentecost was the Big Bang — from there, they were sent out.  The mission was to baptize and to form Christian communities.  The emphasis was on communal life, worship and evangelization.

2.  The Separation from Judaism:  In the beginning, the Christians saw themselves not as a separate faith, but as Jews who have embraced the messiah.  Because they believed that the Gospel was meant for God’s chosen people, they were quite zealous in their preaching, which made the Jewish leadership uncomfortable.  They had been going to synagogue service and then celebrating the Lord’s Supper on Sundays; however, they were eventually kicked out of the synagogues by the authorities, who felt that their preaching was heresy.  This eventually led to the long, painful divorce of the two cultures.  It was very divisive to society.

3.  Paul and the Tension of Gentile Christians:  Paul was uniquely equipped to bridge between the Jewish world and the Gentile world because he was a Jew with Roman citizenship, was the only apostle who did not follow Christ in His earthly ministry, and went from being a persecutor to an evangelizer.  Paul is insistent, boisterous, smart (and knows it) and rigorous.  Paul gets legitimacy in his claim of being an apostle by virtue of how God intervened on the road to Damascus.  Barnabas had to bring some legitimacy to this for the Twelve, since there was tension between Paul and the Twelve.  The question of the Gentiles arose because they were not following the Mosaic law — do they have to become Jewish in order to be Christian?  Paul bridges a) the tension of the Gentile Christians and the Jewish Christians, b) the various early Churches by his missionary activity and c) the institutional and charismatic dimensions of the Church.  Peter orders Paul (brings order to charism); Paul inspires Peter (vivifies the institution).

4.  The Tension of “Already But Not Yet”:  The early Church believed that Christ would be coming back immediately, so there was a sense of urgency to evangelization.  Eventually, they came to realize that they needed to make plans for the continuance of the Church and learn how to live a long life of grace.  Because of this initial sense of urgency, the lapsi were only given one chance to come back.  Over time, reconciliation as developed to understand repeated sin.  In order to construct the Church to last throughout the ages, they began to adopt some structures and practices from the Romans, such as a more centralized form of governance and ministries.  They adopted the basilica as a model for a place of worship and many Roman “trappings” can be found in the liturgy, such as candles, incense and ornate vestments.  Whatever of the culture was found useful for spreading the Gospel was Christianized and used.  If it was effective, it was adopted.  There was nothing which was so profane that it could not be Christianized.

5.  Persecution:  The Romans were generally tolerant towards the plurality of religions within their jurisdiction.  Problems arose due to the Christians’ insistence on worshipping God alone and rejecting state worship, and the fact that they were successful in organizing.  Emperor Nero in particular singled out the Christians to be the scapegoats to deflect criticism after the burning of Rome.  He made it illegal to be a Christian.  The persecutions were sporadic until the reign of Constantine I and the Edict of Milan in 313.

6.  Early Doctrinal Controversies:  Some of the early doctrinal controversies were:

a) Christian duty to follow the Mosaic law, especially as regards circumcision (to settle the issue, Peter makes a statement)
b) Gnosticism: the Gnostics believed that there was a good and a bad God. The good God was associated with the spiritual realm and the bad God was associated with the material realm. You needed to have the secret knowledge in order to live forever with the good God. Their goal was a rejection of everything material and ascendancy.
c) Montanism: this is a variant of Gnosticism; embraced asceticism
d) Celsus: culture attacks Christianity; “His “True Discourse” is the oldest literary attack on Christianity. He criticized much in biblical history for its miracles and absurdities, and expressed his repugnance to the Christian doctrines of the Incarnation and Crucifixion. Objecting that Christians, by refusing to conform to the State, undermined its strength and powers of resistance, he made an impassioned appeal to them to abandon their religious and political intolerance.” (The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church 314)

TFI #13

13.  What was Melchior Cano’s contribution to theological Methodology?

Cano set up the concept of drawing upon wide and various source for theological study.  He introduces the concept of “loci,” which are various places or fields in which one can seek the content of Revelation.  He thought that Scripture and Tradition made up the primary and secondary loci.  What is contained in the first two loci are further developed by the following five loci:

A) The faith of the universal body of believers
B) Synods and Councils
C) The Roman Church and its bishop
D) The Fathers of the Church
E) Scholastic Theologians

There are other loci that Cano called “annexes”:
1. Arguments of natural reason
2. Views of philosophers
3. Lessons of human history
While these do not claim to be sources of revelation, they can give us a perspective. E.g. Philosophy can give us a lens to interpret revelation.

TFI #12

12.  Be able to explain Origen’s body, soul, spirit analogy for interpreting the Scriptures

“A human being has the three component body parts, body, soul and spirit, as Paul suggests in 1 Thessalonians 5:23, and Origen saw in the text of the Bible a similar three-part structure of meaning.  The “body” is the surface meaning of what the Bible narrates; the “soul” is the instruction given to those advancing in the life of faith; the “spirit” is the hidden wisdom of God’s ways, about which hints are now offered until all is finally revealed in heaven.”  (Wicks 11)

TFI #11

11. What key contributions did Iraneus of Lyons and Origen bring to theological Methodology?

St. Iraneus is considered by some to be the first systematic theologian. He concerned himself with refuting the Gnostic heresy. He appealed to the “rule” of faith handed on from the apostles. He showed how the common beliefs — the “one scheme of faith” — formed a foundation on which we could explore deeper meanings. Apostolic tradition as a source of divine Revelation; what we now call Sacred Tradition.

Origen was firm in his conviction that the Scriptures are the inspired Word of God. It was important to learn not only Scripture’s surface meaning, but also the deeper “spiritual meaning.”. He relates these different meanings as analogous to the construct of Body-Soul-Spirit:

Body – surface meaning; the literal sense
Soul – applicability to our own lives; God can speak directly to us through the text
Spirit – God’s hidden wisdom

With Scripture and Tradition together does the theologian have a solid foundation upon which he can begin to uncover the riches of God’s theophany.

TFI #10

10. What are the two main elements of Fr. Wick’s method of “Doing Theology”?

A) Listening: being hearers of Divine Revelation (Positive Theology)
B) Explaining: making an account, placing in context, making a whole

TFI #9

9.  Three incomplete definitions of theology, and Nichols definition

A)  Glorified Spirituality:  How can you have a science about something “mysterious”?  Can’t you only speak about your response?

Nichols:  Faith seeks understanding, and that which we seek to understand is Truth Himself.  It is a way of knowing, not just a way of feeling. 

We can know what God has revealed of Himself and study this.  Faith has to feed study to be a theologian, otherwise you are merely someone engaged in religious studies.

B)  Just Papal and Episcopal Interpretation:  Theology merely attempts to explain and defend what Popes and the Bishops have proclaimed about faith

Nichols:  This is one aspect of the theological disciplines.  However, theology is more than this.  The theologian listens to the whole of Divine Revelation, and asks questions that arise for his exploration.  The Pope and Bishops don’t think of all the questions, they safeguard the answers.  The Magisterium sets the boundaries of theological exploration.  Any theology that cuts itself off from the Holy Spirit working through the Apostles is not a proper theology.

The point is not just papal and church documents, but the field of study is all of Revelation.

C)  Just a Bunch of Facts:  Good theology just stores up a big collection of facts, dates and “technical” ideas about God and the Church…like an encyclopedia.  Sometimes referred to as “positive theology.”

Nichols:  The ultimate goal of theology is to connect the dots, to provide a positive, cohesive vision of who God is and what He is saying.  This is referred to as “systematic theology.”  However, we cannot do systematic theology without positive theology.  If we don’t have some of the dots in the right spot, we won’t get the right image when we go to connect them.

The goal is to be able to put it all together, so that it makes sense, so as to grow in intimacy with God.

Listening, followed by explaining:  the 2 movements in the theological enterprise

Okay, so what is theology?

Nichols:  The task of theology is the disciplined exploration of what is contained in revelation.  Theology serves revelation; it “unpacks” revelation; and it follows a method and structure in order to hear God’s Word as clearly as possible.

The goal of theology is union with God — the faith which seeks understanding.

TFI #8

8.  Can faith contradict reason inherently?

No.  Faith is certain because it is founded upon Truth.  God is god of all knowledge.  If God is all-knowing and all-good, then having faith in Him cannot logically be contrary to reason — to believe this would violate the principle of non-contradiction, and that would violate reason.

“Though faith is above reason, there can never be any real discrepancy between faith and reason.  Since the same God who reveals mysteries and infuses faith has bestowed the light of reason on the human mind, God cannot deny himself, nor can truth contradict truth.”  (Vatican I, Dei Filius 4)

To the extent that we perceive a breach between faith and reason, it means that we lack understanding.

TFI #7

7.  Who said, “Faith seeks understanding” and what does the phrase mean?

St. Anselm made this statement.  Basically, what it means is that if you truly love someone, you always seek to deepen the relationship.  So, if you love, you always want to know more.  If we are passive or don’t care to learn more about God, then we have to question the depth of our relationship with God.  Our faith is a lifelong quest.

TFI #6

6.  Is faith a human act?  Why?

Faith is a human act in that it requires our participation.  Faith is only possible through grace, but we need to consent with our free will.  We have to consciously choose to submit to God.  Faith is not predetermined, and is not predetermined at any point in our lives.